Why Do People Laugh at Creationists?
YouTuber Thunderf00t has an excellent series running in 18 24 parts (so far) entitled Why Do People Laugh at Creationists? And for all the times I’ve laughed in the past as I’ve followed the “controversy,” this series brought back many of those guffaws in one swift rush, and added several new ones.
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5
Part 6
Part 7
Part 8
Part 9
Part 10
Part 11
Part 12
Part 13
Part 14
Part 15
Part 16
Part 17
Part 18
Part 19
Part 20
Part 21
Part 22
Part 23
Part 24





April 22nd, 2008 at 2:43 pm
My question is a personal one that i do not want the answer to but is for you to answer to yourself …. do you believe in God? If not, i can understand why you laugh at creationists. If you do, though, would He lie to you about the creation of the earth and universe?
What is even more funny than a creationist is someone who unquestionably believes in the “Big Bang” theory because “science” has told them this is what happened. Fools do not even question how the “scientific method” has been applied to prove this theory. Do you want to know why? Because the scientific method cannot prove this supposed event (it is not a repeatable cause and effect).
Since both God’s creation and the Big Bang theory are unprovable, which one do you put your blind faith in?
April 22nd, 2008 at 3:58 pm
A creationist,
No.
Good!
Obviously, I can’t answer for all creationists (especially because I am not one, although I used to be one), but clearly many people feel that the Bible and science are reconcilable— just not by taking the Bible literally. So they don’t see it as any kind of “lie of God” to think that the Genesis account does not refer to six literal days.
If there is one thing that scientists an science-educated laypeople do, it is “question things.” I am not aware of any scientists who “unquestioningly believe.” So which “fools” are you referring to? Oh, right— anyone who doesn’t believe in your deity.
And why stick the word “science” in scare quotes? Didn’t Galileo show that objects fall at the same speed regardless of mass? Do you reject this finding? It is the product of science. So where is the line between the science you accept and the science you reject? The only science that scientists reject is badly-done science. But as a creationist, you must reject any science that conflicts with your holy book— a disingenuous distinction if there ever was one.
This is a false dichotomy. For one thing, which god do you believe in? There are quite a few gods other than Yahweh vying for worshipers out there, you know. Secondly, it is possible to sidestep the whole faith question by doing exactly what real scientists do: answering “I don’t know,” when they really don’t know.
Finally, you’re not even being clear by what you mean by “unprovable.” The Big Bang theory is very well supported by multiple lines of evidence. You’re probably one of those creationists who don’t even really know what a scientific theory is— you know, like the “theory of gravity,” or “atomic theory,” etc.
Thanks for playing. Get an education, then try again.