This is a recent exchange that took place between myself and someone who saw my entry in the Blasphemy Challenge.
Regards.
I see the claims of Islam to be equally absurd and unprovable to those of Christianity. A simple example of this is that Islam accepts the Old Testament and the many absurd and atrocious stories in it as true.
Robert
Of course, Islam accepts only parts of the Old Testament as true, but denies some of it as fabrications and corruptions as you say.
I am not very knowledgable, but my offer of access to my friend is still on the table, kindly let me know.
Regards,
Robert
In any case, I respect you and leave the option open, should you ever choose to take it up. Thanks for your time in reading my messages and responding.
Regards.
See http://thetruereligion.org/
Here is a quote from that site:
Amongst the most powerful and thought-provoking testimonies are those of former Christian priests and missionaries who have discovered the one true religion.
http://thetruereligion.org/modules/wfsection/index.php?category=25
Robert
Again I urge you not to look at the thoughts of normal Muslims to find out exactly what Islam teaches. Instead, find scholarly literature, works from the great minds and thinkers of Islamic theology. While Islamic theology has no exclusive claim to Truth, out of the rank-and-file Muslims, probably 99% believe you have to believe in Muhammad as a prophet to go to Heaven, whereas no such thing exists in the Qur’an or Hadith. Therefore, again, do not look to normal Muslims, and I would instead point you in the direction of scholarly literature. The same problems of scholars and thinkers and learned people vs. normal rank-and-file practicers exists everywhere.
I am talking more about scholars like Murteza Mutahhari, Allamah Tabatabai, Muhammad Iqbal, Fazlur Rahman, and Ali Shariati. The great minds of Islamic philosophy and theology who have considerable works translated into English. To take the first example, just a few of Murteza Mutahhari’s works in English that relate to man, universe, and God:
• Fundamentals of Islamic thought : God, man, and the universe
• Man and Universe
• Understanding Islamic sciences : philosophy, theology, mysticism, morality, jurisprudence
• The human being and his destiny
In any case, I am not here to debate you personally, I am simply extending the hand to knowledge through offering access to a friend who is much more knowledgable than me.
Regards.
Regards,
Robert
“He is an outspoken critic of Islam who has written extensively on what he views as the oppressive nature of Islam and religion in general.”
“The name Ibn Warraq is a pseudonym that has traditionally been adopted by dissident authors throughout the history of Islam.”
His works include “Why I Am Not a Muslim” and “Leaving Islam: Apostates Speak Out”. His books on the Qur’an and Muhammad, I have just learned, are intensely anti-Islamic, and biased as well as driven more by dislike of Islam than by honest discovery and analysis.
You are correct in discounting my analogy, it is rather like asking a Nazi about Jews: one who is fundamentally opposed and has a history of dissidence will most likely not be a good source for honest information.
Unfortunately the person I know has recounted [sic] his offer after I told him about the last line of your response. First, he doesn’t write to anyone, he is contacted by others. But then, he does not grant requests for exchange to anyone who seems to have the slightest dishonesty or secret motive behind the discourse. Your request to blog surely seems a little disturbing, given that if you are genuinely interested in a dive into the Islamic realm, there would be no need to publish before the knowledge has come. Such tactics are used by those who have impure intentions, and for these reasons he wishes to give you time until you find it within yourself to have the freedom of self and the courage to take an honest dive.
In any case, may peace be upon you, and may the seekers of Truth be rewarded.
You say your friend does not write to anyone, but is contacted by others. Yet I did not seek him out— you wrote to me as his proxy. This puts a strange light on your statements about him.
I don’t know why my offer to blog a dialog about ultimate truth would be the least bit disturbing. Surely his arguments and evidence can withstand public scrutiny?
I do not “dive” into matters of the supernatural. I explore.
Regards,
Robert
























